Close Menu
geekfence.comgeekfence.com
    What's Hot

    I Like Ferrari’s Luce EV. But This Is Why It’s Heartbreaking

    May 27, 2026

    5G core growth shifts outside China, Dell’Oro says

    May 27, 2026

    From Nature publication to catalyzing Computational Discovery

    May 27, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Facebook Instagram
    geekfence.comgeekfence.com
    • Home
    • UK Tech News
    • AI
    • Big Data
    • Cyber Security
      • Cloud Computing
      • iOS Development
    • IoT
    • Mobile
    • Software
      • Software Development
      • Software Engineering
    • Technology
      • Green Technology
      • Nanotechnology
    • Telecom
    geekfence.comgeekfence.com
    Home»Technology»Wisconsin lawsuit targets Kalshi, Robinhood and Coinbase over prediction markets
    Technology

    Wisconsin lawsuit targets Kalshi, Robinhood and Coinbase over prediction markets

    AdminBy AdminApril 26, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read6 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Wisconsin lawsuit targets Kalshi, Robinhood and Coinbase over prediction markets
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



    Wisconsin has filed a civil complaint in Dane County Circuit Court accusing Kalshi, Robinhood, and Coinbase, along with affiliated subsidiaries, of operating what it describes as illegal sports betting through prediction markets and event contracts under state law.

    The complaint opens by reaffirming the state’s gambling restrictions, stating: “Sports betting has long been illegal in Wisconsin, with exceptions only for certain Native American tribal gaming operations.”

    It further alleges coordinated conduct among the companies: “Yet three companies—Kalshi, Robinhood, and Coinbase—are working together to facilitate illegal sports betting throughout the state.”

    State alleges disguised sports wagering through “event contracts”

    Wisconsin argues the platforms are effectively enabling sports wagering while rebranding it as financial trading. The complaint states: “Through their so-called ‘prediction markets,’ Kalshi, Robinhood, and Coinbase profit from Wisconsin residents placing bets on the outcome of sporting events, just like how ordinary casino sportsbooks profit from the bets people make there.”

    The filing contends that the underlying structure mirrors traditional gambling products despite its financial-market framing.

    College basketball betting used as key example

    As part of its argument, Wisconsin cites specific examples from college athletics betting activity. The complaint notes:

    For instance, Wisconsinites could use these companies’ services to place all kinds of bets on the recent NCAA college basketball tournament, including who would win the Final Four matchup between the University of Michigan and the University of Arizona, which team would cover the point spread, and even which team would first score ten points.”

    The state argues these offerings demonstrate that the platforms are functionally indistinguishable from sportsbook-style wagering.

    Allegation of “casino-style” mechanics behind trading language

    The complaint also focuses on how the platforms generate revenue, stating: “And for every bet made, these companies collect a fee akin to a casino’s rake at a poker table.”

    Wisconsin argues that this fee structure reinforces its claim that the companies are operating gambling services rather than neutral financial marketplaces.

    The filing further claims the companies use financial terminology to mask gambling mechanics. It states: “Kalshi, Robinhood, and Coinbase use a fig leaf to disguise the casino-style sports betting they facilitate in Wisconsin.”

    “They relabel their sports bets as ‘event contracts,’ meaning contracts traded between buyers and sellers at agreed-upon prices that mimic the odds of a sports-related outcome.”

    Pricing structure tied to implied probabilities

    Wisconsin also details how contract pricing reflects real-time probability estimates.

    “As of April 3, 2026, traders could buy contracts taking the position that the University of Michigan would win its Final Four matchup with the University of Arizona for around $0.53, which reflected a roughly 53% projected chance of Michigan winning.”

    It adds that payouts function in binary fashion: winning positions pay $1 per contract, while losing positions expire worthless, mirroring traditional betting outcomes.

    Broader legal pressure on prediction markets

    Separately, prediction market operators are facing increasing regulatory scrutiny across multiple jurisdictions. In New York, regulators and prosecutors have pursued actions involving Coinbase and Gemini over compliance and consumer protection concerns tied to trading products.

    Kalshi is also engaged in ongoing litigation, including an injunction request in Montana seeking to block state-level restrictions on its contracts, while an Arizona court is handling procedural disputes in a separate challenge involving the classification of event contracts.

    Wisconsin seeks injunction and legal classification

    Wisconsin is asking the court to halt the companies from offering sports-related event contracts within the state, declare the activity unlawful under gambling statutes, and classify it as a public nuisance requiring immediate relief.

    Featured image: Kenneth C. Zirkel, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    I Like Ferrari’s Luce EV. But This Is Why It’s Heartbreaking

    May 27, 2026

    Does AI really make workers more productive?

    May 26, 2026

    Indonesia bans Polymarket over online gambling concerns

    May 25, 2026

    The Download: coding’s future, the ‘Steroid Olympics,’ and AI-driven science

    May 24, 2026

    Ferrari is using IBM’s AI to create F1 superfans

    May 23, 2026

    Yusuf Mehdi, a 35-year Microsoft veteran who has been its consumer chief marketing officer since 2023, will leave the company after the next fiscal year (Todd Bishop/GeekWire)

    May 22, 2026
    Top Posts

    Understanding U-Net Architecture in Deep Learning

    November 25, 202546 Views

    Hard-braking events as indicators of road segment crash risk

    January 14, 202629 Views

    Redefining AI efficiency with extreme compression

    March 25, 202627 Views
    Don't Miss

    I Like Ferrari’s Luce EV. But This Is Why It’s Heartbreaking

    May 27, 2026

    You know things are bad when the Pope gets involved. No doubt reeling from a…

    5G core growth shifts outside China, Dell’Oro says

    May 27, 2026

    From Nature publication to catalyzing Computational Discovery

    May 27, 2026

    Announcing Lakebase Change Data Feed (CDF)

    May 27, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    About Us

    At GeekFence, we are a team of tech-enthusiasts, industry watchers and content creators who believe that technology isn’t just about gadgets—it’s about how innovation transforms our lives, work and society. We’ve come together to build a place where readers, thinkers and industry insiders can converge to explore what’s next in tech.

    Our Picks

    I Like Ferrari’s Luce EV. But This Is Why It’s Heartbreaking

    May 27, 2026

    5G core growth shifts outside China, Dell’Oro says

    May 27, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
    Loading
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 Geekfence.All Rigt Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.