Close Menu
geekfence.comgeekfence.com
    What's Hot

    Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights Review

    February 14, 2026

    Infrastructure, Not Compute, is the Real AI Bottleneck

    February 14, 2026

    ALS stole this musician’s voice. AI let him sing again.

    February 14, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    Facebook Instagram
    geekfence.comgeekfence.com
    • Home
    • UK Tech News
    • AI
    • Big Data
    • Cyber Security
      • Cloud Computing
      • iOS Development
    • IoT
    • Mobile
    • Software
      • Software Development
      • Software Engineering
    • Technology
      • Green Technology
      • Nanotechnology
    • Telecom
    geekfence.comgeekfence.com
    Home»Nanotechnology»Nanoparticle-mediated targeted protein degradation (NanoTPD): Principles, rational design and mechanisms of degradation
    Nanotechnology

    Nanoparticle-mediated targeted protein degradation (NanoTPD): Principles, rational design and mechanisms of degradation

    AdminBy AdminNovember 15, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read1 Views
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Email
    Nanoparticle-mediated targeted protein degradation (NanoTPD): Principles, rational design and mechanisms of degradation
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The concept of targeted protein degradation (TPD) was proposed in 1999 [1]. Two years later, the first proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTAC) demonstrated selective synthetic molecule-mediated protein removal inside cells selectively [2]. Unlike occupancy-driven inhibitors, TPD eliminates “undruggable” proteins by directing the proteins of interest (POI) to cellular degradation machinery, including the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagy-lysosome pathway (Fig. 1A) [3], [4]. A typical TPD platform comprises a POI-binding ligand, an effector (e.g., E3 ligase) recruiter, and a chemical linker [5]. The induced proximity between POI and effector triggers efficient POI degradation [6].

    PROTACs, first entered clinical trials in 2019 (ARV-110/471) [7], rely heavily on E3 ligases (e.g., cereblon (CRBN) or von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)), and enable efficient degradation of intracellular targets, particularly cytosolic proteins [8]. However, clinical translation faces following challenges: poor membrane permeability, restricted tissue distribution of E3 ligases, off-target risks, and suboptimal biodistribution limiting therapeutic efficacy [9], [10]. Notably, the hook effect is a critical challenge. PROTACs preferentially form nonproductive binary complexes (“POI-PROTAC” or “E3 ligase-PROTAC”) at excessive concentrations, disrupting ternary complex assembly and reducing degradation efficiency [11]. Molecular glues (e.g., thalidomide) with lower molecular weight also exploit the UPS by directly tethering an E3 ligase to a POI without requiring a linker [12]. However, rational design for molecular glues remains challenging, and most are discovered serendipitously [13]. Emerging modalities including autophagy-targeting chimeras (AUTACs) and lysosome-targeting chimeras (LYTACs) extend targetability to extracellular, membrane, and even cytosolic proteins through the autophagy-lysosome pathway [14], [15]. Intracellular substrates reach lysosomes and are degraded via autophagolysosome, whereas membrane and secreted proteins are endocytosed into lysosomes and degraded via endosomal and lysosomal pathways [16]. AUTACs utilize K63-linked polyubiquitination to bridge LC3-labeled autophagosomes for autophagy-lysosomal degradation [17]. Autophagy-targeting chimera (AUTOTACs) [18] and autophagosome-tethering compound (ATTECs) [19], directly engage p62 and LC3, respectively, facilitating POI sequestration into the autolysosome without ubiquitination. Additionally, chaperone-mediated autophagy targeting chimeras (CMATACs) exploit chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) by conjugating KFERQ-like motifs to POI-binding ligands for heat shock cognate 71 kDa protein (HSC70) and lysosome-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP-2A)-mediated lysosomal degradation [20]. Regarding the endosome-lysosomal pathway, LYTACs utilize cell-surface lysosome-targeting receptors (LTRs) to internalize POI complexes for lysosomal degradation [21]. Multivalent glycan ligands for ‌LTRs present synthetic challenges and are subject to variable receptor expression across tissues and cell types [22], [23]. Autophagy-lysosome targeting degraders precisely eliminate POIs via endogenous machinery, yet encounter translational challenges such as suboptimal bioavailability, off-target distribution, and synthetic complexity [24].

    Nanotechnology therefore offers robust solutions for these unmet needs. Nanoparticles (NPs), a commonly used drug delivery system, enhance drug permeability and bioavailability while minimizing off-target effects and toxicity (Fig. 1B) [25], [26]. Their passive tumor-targeting via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, coupled with endocytic uptake via clathrin-, caveolin-, or phagocytosis-mediated routes, enables intracellular delivery and subsequent fusion with lysosomes [27], [28]. With surface modification and payload customization, NPs offer a versatile platform for next-generation TPD technology [29], [30].

    Here, we introduce the emerging NP-mediated targeted protein degradation (NanoTPD) in two categories (Fig. 1C). The first is TPD-loaded NPs, and the second is termed NP-mediated targeting chimeras (NanoTACs). Since TPD-loaded NPs have been extensively reviewed [31], [32], [33], our discussion will focus on the second class, i.e., NanoTACs. NanoTAC strategies are categorized by structural and degradation mechanisms, and selected cases are reviewed by summarizing their therapeutic potential and future directions in the TPD field.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Issue 86

    February 14, 2026

    What shape is a uranium nucleus? – Physics World

    February 13, 2026

    First Look into the Electrostatic Landscape of a Moiré Unit Cell

    February 12, 2026

    Scientists finally solve a 100-year-old mystery in the air we breathe

    February 11, 2026

    Molecularly imprinted nanoreactors: Bridging enzyme mimicry and synthetic catalysis

    February 9, 2026

    Tandem architectures for electrochemical CO2 reduction: from coupled atomic sites to tandem electrolysers

    February 8, 2026
    Top Posts

    Hard-braking events as indicators of road segment crash risk

    January 14, 202617 Views

    Understanding U-Net Architecture in Deep Learning

    November 25, 202512 Views

    How to integrate a graph database into your RAG pipeline

    February 8, 20268 Views
    Don't Miss

    Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights Review

    February 14, 2026

    Summary created by Smart Answers AIIn summary:Tech Advisor highlights six critical errors in Emerald Fennell’s…

    Infrastructure, Not Compute, is the Real AI Bottleneck

    February 14, 2026

    ALS stole this musician’s voice. AI let him sing again.

    February 14, 2026

    What is Prompt Chaining?

    February 14, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    About Us

    At GeekFence, we are a team of tech-enthusiasts, industry watchers and content creators who believe that technology isn’t just about gadgets—it’s about how innovation transforms our lives, work and society. We’ve come together to build a place where readers, thinkers and industry insiders can converge to explore what’s next in tech.

    Our Picks

    Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights Review

    February 14, 2026

    Infrastructure, Not Compute, is the Real AI Bottleneck

    February 14, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
    Loading
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2026 Geekfence.All Rigt Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.